Silenced.
The Silent Holocaust of abortion takes the lives of 42 million human beings each and every year.
My prayer is that my work will make a difference in the lives of those who are affected by abortion: the children, the mothers, the fathers, the doctors.
May their voices be heard through mine.
"Speak up for those who can not speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy." Proverbs 31:8-9
(via allarecreatedequal)
Also, it seems a little odd that giving up a child would be so difficult emotionally (and given, it is) but aborting that same child a few months earlier is great and a big relief involving no emotional trauma.
Students from Texas are joining Michigan’s Mecosta and Osceola counties in their fight for life! Will you join, too?
up until the point where whatever I’m doing affects someone else’s body.
A fetus is a small, developing human being. I have equal rights, and so should the human growing inside of me.
My freedom ends where another begins.
All Pro-Lifers say “ITS NOT A FETUS ITS A BABY AND A LIVING THING.”
Okay.
Whelp.
When a woman is pregnant… It’s HER baby.
Inside HER body.
It’s HER baby.
Ultimately, its up to HER how she wants to raise HER baby.
If she doesn’t want to raise HER baby, or have HER baby, she shouldn’t have to have HER baby.
HER baby, HER body.
Not yours. So yes. Get out of her uterus.
HER baby is not HER body. HER baby is not HER uterus. HER baby is not HER life. And it’s not HER choice whether the baby that is NOT her body, is NOT her uterus, and is NOT her life lives.
Former abortionist speaks.
*Warning: graphic verbal description*
It’s not a part of the woman’s body. It is a separate human being.
No one is trying to “control your uterus.” We are just trying to protect an innocent being from death.
True Point.
Anonymous Asks:
silentholocaust Said:
I’m sorry you are so offended by my word choice.
But honestly, not trying to be rude, I don’t understand what is so offensive about the term “pro-abortion”. “Pro-lifers” are for the right to life, and people that are “pro-abortion” are for the right to have abortions. There’s nothing offensive in that. It’s simply stating the right you support. In fact, it’s much more direct and logical than saying “pro-choice”; if “pro-choice” wasn’t such a common term, no one would know what you were referring to, the right to choose what exactly? “Pro-abortion” on the other hand, is self explanatory. I’m not being rude by using this term, I’m being direct.
As for “dangerous pro-choice logic”, I didn’t state that ALL pro-choice logic is dangerous and will lead to infanticide, but admittedly, most of the arguments I hear to support abortion, can also be applied to a newborn. That being said, I realize most pro-choicers would say the idea of after-birth abortions is absurd and terrible. If you didn’t read the article, I would encourage you to read it before being angry with me and to think about the reasons a fetus is thought by many to be not fully a person. It’s interesting that in one case, when the child is in the womb, arguments used to justify the fetus’s lack of personhood are accepted, but the same arguments once the child are born are deemed ridiculous and killing them is labeled infanticide.
(via imaprolifeteen)
